OLIVER TOMI] Fresco Gallery in Belgrade is one of the first galleries in the world to show copies of medieval works of art. There were a number of reasons for its opening but two are the most prominent. First, considering that in 1459 the Serb State succumbed under the long centuries of Turkish occupation, a larger part of movable treasure was either destroyed or robbed. Only frescoes were somewhat preserved, decorating the walls of monasteries mostly tombstones of Serb rulers and feudal lords’ foundations. To be peaceful eternal resting-places of the buried and silent homes for monks, monasteries were built away from the main roads and towns. So, they were shelters from Turks who would not gladly go deeper into forests or roadless areas as long as the tribute was regularly paid. However, today this is not good for tourists and others concerned who would have to go a long way if they want to see all monuments of Serb medieval heritage. Exhibiting the copies of Serb frescoes in the Gallery makes possible to see at least, even during a short visit to the capital, the most beautiful frescoes produced thanks to old Serb benefactors. Another justification for the Gallery’s existence is a documentary value of the copies themselves. They perfectly exactly reproduce the state of a fresco at the very moment of its emergence, each scratch on it, and even the minutest one. A fresco may be accidentally damaged or even destroyed in the meantime (as it happened during the latest events in former Yugoslavia), so a copy remains an important document to be used for its restoration. It is impossible to provide a brief history of Serb wall painting herein for the lack of space, therefore only some basic facts will be presented. Medieval Serbia, being an Orthodox Christian country, belonged to Byzantine cultural and artistic world. So, models for constructing and wall painting of Serb churches, and even painters at the beginning, came from Greek areas, particularly from Constantinople and Thessalonica, the largest artistic centres of the eastern Christian world. That is why Serb medieval art is more dedicated to painting than to sculpture (prevailing in the West), using fresco and icon painting techniques, while stained-glass windows were completely neglected. Very little daylight penetrated into Byzantine and Serb churches but this was done on purpose because the stress was on mystical impression that candles produced by illuminating sky-blue and golden background in wall paintings and icons. All Serb artistic principles were taken over from Byzantium as early as during the Nemanya Dynasty (1166-1459).
|
![]() A famous "White Angel" from the Mileseve Monastery fresco (1222-1224) is only one part of the scene from Chrism-bearer on Christ’s tomb. Actually, such scene (like the Descent to Hades) was used in Orthodox art to represent Christ’s Resurrection. Unlike Catholic art, where the very moment of Christ’s coming out of the grave is presented, the Orthodox world strictly adhered to the Gospel text. It said that the already empty grave and an angel on it was found by women who had come to anoint Christ’s body with precious oil i.e. chrism. This scene is found above the composition of the founder, King Vladislav (who abdicated in 1242), where he is giving a model of the church to Christ, through Mother of God, to keep it, and below is King’s tomb. A message is clear: by expressing his belief in Christ’s resurrection, the founder himself hoped to resurrect on the Last Judgement Day, and so he presented Christ with the church, recommending himself to his mercy when the destiny of the living and the dead was judged.
|
![]()
|
![]() In the Sopocani Monastery (1263-1276) there are probably the most beautiful 13th-century frescoes in Europe. The painters coming from Constantinople depicted them for Serb King Uros I (1242-1276). The largest among the frescoes is the scene of The Ascension of the Virgin Mary painted in its common place, on west wall. Christ is accepting his Mother’s soul, surrounded by the assembled apostles grieving and angels flocking together. Extremely impressive is the outstanding beauty of figures that can be compared with the greatest creations of ancient art for their proportions, draperies painting, postures, features and expressions of their faces. Ancient pagan art inspired Byzantine artists, as well as Orthodox ones, again and again once in a few centuries. In the second half of 13th century that return to classical beauty and style was so strong that it was called the Palaeologus "Renaissance" (after the name of the last Byzantine ruling dynasty).
|
![]() The Palaeologan style was at its "classical" stage when Serbia was ruled by King Milutin (1282-1321), the greatest among all founders from the Nemanyid Dynasty. In the Studenica Monastery he built the so-called King’s Church, where walls were covered with frescoes immediately after 1314. King Milutin even established a royal painting workshop that was in charge of two famous painters from Thessalonica, Michael Astrapa and Eutihios (whose activity can be followed from 1294-1321). Compared to the style in Sopocani, there were very many changes: scenes became small to increase their number in churches, and within each scene the number of figures and details was increased, their size being reduced. Each scene was to tell a story, therefore the style was called "narrative". Painters still adhered to ancient principles and even made them more profound. Namely, figures were more plastic than ever before and sometimes were presented in several planes to make space deeper. However, this can not be understood as an attempt of illusionism practiced by Giotto in Italy. Here, the space with architectural background is reduced on purpose and used only as a framework for a story and dramatic elements, and perspective applied is so-called "inverse" i.e. nearer objects are smaller and those farther away are bigger. Thus, viewer’s attention is directed to the foreground but not to infinite distances.
|
![]()
|
![]()
|
Oliver Tomi} The author (1963) holds MA degree in the History of Art, is a curator of the National Museum, Belgrade and assistant lecturer in "General History of Medieval Art" at the Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade, History of Art Department. He has published a number of professional and scientific papers.
|